Real Trump-resistance is fact-based

In his article in the Swiss newspaper NZZ, Slavoj Žižek warns rightly that the left’s response to Trump’s election should not just be self-complacent moral indignation but include hard self-criticism. I can’t agree more. Even when I embrace and welcome actions of icons like Meryl Streep or companies that back away from the new president, there is a big danger just below the surface. When large companies known for their precarious social impacts[1] or celebrities that belong to the establishment and supported Hillary Clinton[2] are now portrayed or portray themselves as the spearhead of resistance, the anti-Trump movements descends into a rebranding event for the establishment where the exponents of society fight as the brave against the villain (who is eventually removed) and where at the end the Statue of Liberty is replaced by a statue of Hillary, the new Jeanne d’Arc of America … In other words, a Hollywood-like show for a big whitewash of the current establishment and its economic order.

True critique has to address more than the person of Trump. Even when Trump is vulgar and lacks almost all presidential qualities, it is the things he stands for that have to be addressed and fought against: Unconstitutional decrees first, but also increased military spending, social injustice, tax exemption for the rich, illegal wars, etc.

As Žižek writes, the left has the unique opportunity to renew itself. The left lost because they (i.e. the Democratic Nomination Committee) sidelined and boycotted Bernie Sanders, because they ignored the urge for true change, because they – the establishment – wanted to go on and on with profits for the rich and losses for the poor ignoring the underprivileged in the middle of their country. With Trump in the Oval Office the left (the DNC and the Democrats) should finally see the writing on the wall and act. Only a radical departure from the current economic system that is socially, ecologically and morally corrupt and rotten can bring a change. Only a departure from the neo-liberal credo will mobilise the masses.[3]

For once the press is not blindly parroting and blandishing the actions of the White House as they usually do. It is therefore the time for true critique.

Overcoming Trump means …

  • replacing the aggressive, (regime-changing) foreign policy of the last 65 years with a policy of mutual respect, acceptance of international law and the pursuit of peace (including the abolishment of nuclear weapons worldwide)
  • reducing military spending from 50% gradually to 5%[4]
  • ending NATO[5]
  • ending the fossil fuel era and shifting to 100% sustainable energy
  • preventing climate change[6]
  • reducing threats to democracy like extreme wealth concentration[7]
  • ensuring minority rights and counteracting racism[8]
  • lessoning the gap between rich and poor
  • creating a single payer health care system

We truly don’t need self-complacent moral indignation and self-presentation.

Real Trump-resistance is fact-based!


1 e.g Uber

2 e.g. Madonna

3 Unless the masses are not deluded into a war or the like, see here

4 There is no military threat to the US anywhere in the world.

5 Contrary to public opinion, NATO is not a defensive but an offensive and often aggressive alliance. It did not defend during the last 20 years but invade and kill.

6 Climate change will not be preventable any more but it can be contained according to the Paris agreement.

7 Trump’s rise to presidency is just the most recent attack of unregulated, excessive wealth on democracy – with unprecedented impacts.

8 Education is the key to counteract racism. One has to start in kindergarden …


1 Comment

Filed under politics

A Double Standard

US interference in other election is standard procedure but the US gets outraged about  alleged  (proves are still missing) interference by other states.

Read this very good article about the ‘double standard’:

A Double Standard? By Marc Trachtenberg

Leave a comment

Filed under politics

A strange déjà-vu

We had it all sixteen years ago. When George W. Bush became president, the world stood against him. But then came 9/11 and suddenly the village idiot received unrestricted solidarity[1]. Now Trump stands against almost the whole world and if he can’t deliver to those angry whites that voted for him, he will be in splendid isolation.

Are we heading therefore for a new 9/11?

Donald Trump might need a new 9/11 when the deceit of his campaign promises becomes evident. If you can’t keep your promises, get an outer cause, an enemy to blame for as “in conditions of a sudden threat or challenge to the public’s sense of domestic well-being”[2] the masses will agree to military spending (“the pursuit of power”) and will accept their economic situation (“economic self-denial”). After a few months of failed policies and world wide contempt, what could Trump welcome more than an “America under attack”-scenario?

For now the angry whites are kept at bay with tough anti-immigrant policies like building the wall against Mexico or banning Muslims entering the country. Decrees like these create the impression that he does what he promised and pacify the voters—but only for a limited amount of time. When no new jobs spring into life, when the salaries don’t rise, when the infrastructure remains at the bottom, the angry whites will have to be deluded in other ways. As Trump almost for sure won’t be able to create jobs and economic growth for all as his cabinet is made of generals and multi-billionaires (the latter representing the establishment he claims to fight), the question is not if but when it will happen.

A war can distract the angry whites and give them a new object of anger. A war brings excuse and emotions: they take away our progress”, “they prevent America to become great again”. The new enemy will explain the failures of the current presidency and direct the anger to a new target. And all those who do not agree and dare to voice dissident opinion will be decried as unpatriotic.

I met one single Trump voter. He was full of anger and his arguments were all one liners. From “lock her up” to “bomb them down” it is a small step.

But a new 9/11 will also silence other governments and downgrade topics like climate change, the divide between rich and poor, racial inequality and other looming environmental catastrophes to name just a few. In the absence of a “truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat”[3] the public—including non-US governments— will remind the current administration endlessly about the real problems of this world. A war therefore will not just calm the angry whites but also the heads of non-US states.

If 9/11 was an inside job, there are high times for a second 9/11 [4] as war might be the one thing that can change Trump’s standing in the world and hide his inexorable coming failures.

The bulletin of Atomic Scientists have moved the doomsday clock closer to midnight. It stands now at two and a half minutes to midnight.[5]


1 German then-chancellor Gerhard Schröder just after the attacks.

2 Zbigniew Brzezinski, The Grand Chessboard, p. 37

3The Grand Chessboard, p. 211

4 To be correct, it would be the 4[th] 9/11. The first 9/11 happened 300 years ago in Catalan, the second in Chile 1973, the third is the commonly known 9/11/



Filed under politics

The daily Trump resistance

Amerikanische Botschaft
Sulgeneckstrasse 19
3005 Bern

January 26, 2017

Subject: North Dakota pipeline and Keystone XL pipeline
Dear Madam, dear Sir,
Your president’s recent decision—apart from ignoring democratic opinion and minority rights—sets the course for the destruction of the planet in general and the the human species in particular. Threatening to destroy the biosphere and the life and future prospect of billions of people is nothing less than the biggest terrorist declaration in human history.

Sincerely yours
Thierry Blanc

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

The daily Trump resistance

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

The daily Trump resistance

ZCommunications » The issue is not Trump. It is us.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

‘Post fact’ and ‘fake news’ era

Media tell us that we have reached the post fact era. But to me it seems more that we have just reached a new level within an era that has started a long time ago. The Greeks complained already 500 BC that the good speaker can undermine democracy. Propaganda and so-called framing have aggravated this problem exponentially. Facts are distorted and reality is framed with the aim of manufacturing consent of the population. The one-sided reporting about Crimea or Syria are just the recent examples.

We had the misfortune of actually trying to talk about the problems facing America and providing real solutions,” Sanders said in an interview with DemocracyNow[1]. With the new president-elect, media manipulation might just add a new modus operandi: Do not speak about the real problems. Let the masses care about the private lives of famous actors, football players and other celebrities, entertain them with sports events, soap operas and the latest Hollywood productions but do not let them come in contact with real political questions. Politics in the ‘post fact’ era is reduced to the vulgar utterances and the public’s reaction to them.

As we have seen during the election campaign, Trump’s nonsense lacking most political substance was given fare more media coverage than Bernie Sanders’s statements of the factual policy.[2] Trump received between $1 and $3 billion of free air time. In comparison, Trump got between 16 to 320 times more air time than Sanders[3]. Addressing real problems earns you the boycott of the establishment, especially the media.

It might be a systemic problem, intrinsic to capitalism itself. As CBS chief executive Les Moonves said at a conference in San Francisco the Trump spectacle “may not be good for America, but it’s damn good for CBS” as “CNN will make approximately $100 million in television and digital advertising revenues more than it would expect in the typical election year,”.[4]

But it might as well be a desired development for the establishment. In a world where the gap between rich an poor is vaster than 1929 and two main disasters – atomic holocaust and climate change – are looming at the horizon, the world economy needs a drastic correction moving away from fossil fuel and war-profiteering.

Capitalist economic surplus is extremely unevenly distributed. The 0.1%, the establishment, do not want the masses partake in this surplus and therefore do not want a change. Their attention diverted to exaggerated threats like global terrorism[5] the masses are made to consent. Consent to give up basic rights and consent to be relegated of decision making by the rulers. Meanwhile the masses fear terror and are outraged by disgusting tweets, the 0.1% go on cashing in the profits and ignoring the world’s looming catastrophes.

News and infotainment that keep discussing the emperor’s clothes are nothing new. But with the absence of even addressing the real problems, the manufacturing of consent has reached a new extreme.


1How the Media Iced Out Bernie Sanders & Helped Donald Trump Win,

2 Ibid.

3 Ibid.


5 Compared to the danger of nuclear war or global warming, the terror victims in Europe much less than those of car accidents or even being crushed by a unstable television! (cf.


Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized